Wally Again

Post a photo to get comments and suggestions on how it can be improved. For best help you should include the relevant EXIF information. (Use "Photo Sharing" if you simply want to share images and are not after feedback.)
User avatar
Nina
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri 17 Aug 2012, 22:16
Location: London
Contact:

Wally Again

Postby Nina » Tue 16 Apr 2013, 15:32

This time I thought I'd give him a more "lived in" look.
Any thoughts on this?

gritty2_6596.jpg
gritty2_6596.jpg (705.18 KiB) Viewed 3366 times
Regards

Nina

Check out my latest work
On www.pbase.com/ninaludwig
User avatar
davidc
Posts: 2410
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2012, 11:27
Location: location, location.
Contact:

Re: Wally Again

Postby davidc » Tue 16 Apr 2013, 16:50

Saw this on 365project first but will replicate the comments here. I quite like the contrasty, oversharpened look - reminds me of the Dragan effect - although the pixellated background is a bit distracting when viewed on the larger size allowed by the forum.

An example of the Dragan Effect -

Image
Check out my website - davidcandlish.photography
My Top 50 album is here
walterconquy
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue 18 Sep 2012, 23:23

Re: Wally Again

Postby walterconquy » Wed 17 Apr 2013, 15:30

HI NINA ITS THE LOOK ,WITH ALL THE GRAVELLY TEXTURE, THAT YOU WOULD GIVE A SEXY YOUNG ACTOR IN SCI FI FILM, DOES IT WORK ? WHO KNOWS. I DON'T HAVE BLUE EYES, I HAVE SEXY BROWN EYES. WHAT DO OTHERS SAY, I SHALL HAVE A BROWSE. WALLY
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Re: Wally Again

Postby Mike Farley » Wed 17 Apr 2013, 16:36

I find myself in agreement with Dave about the oversharpened, contrasty look. As I have previously concurred with him on his views about your other shot of Wally, that alone is cause for concern. ;)

It's an effect which might have some potential for the right subject, but is not especially flattering the way it is done here. In particular, the pixellation is very off putting. Also, the reflections which are partially obscuring both of Wally's eyes look rather odd, his left eye especially.

It is an unusual viewpoint for a portrait, shot from above and the subject looking away from the camera, the crop just skimming the top of his head. This suggests to me that you might have chosen to present it this way to try and salvage something from an awkward pose which did not work as a straight image. Extremes of manipulation have their place provided that such processing adds something, but it is not a panacea.

An interesting experiment and definitely one worth trying, but for me at least, it has not suceeded on this occasion.
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)

Return to “Image Critique”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests