Mata wrote:There is that issue of safety as well. I have also come across a number of photographers who have been harassed.
More reason to get rid of the neck strap, especially Nikon with its Black strip and large yellow writing. It just shouts ‘look at me’ Even if you turn the strap over you still have the camera hanging around your neck. DSLR draws attention by its very size.
I am taking an interest in night photography and am pondering how best to deal with this area before it actually becomes an issue.
Shooting during the day in locations where there are other people around is generally safe. You might get some hassle from individuals, but robbery or serious assault are less likely. Night photography is more problematic as there are not so many other people, which leaves the way open for the opportunistic. The best advice is to make sure that you are accompanied by a friend who can watch your back while you are shooting if you are venturing somewhere that is not well frequented after dark.
Often night shooting involves the use of a tripod due to long exposure times, but where the scene is reasonably well lit it is possible to get away with handholding at reasonably low ISOs by shooting a fast lens at or near its maximum aperture.
See this link for an example:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=293Mata wrote:
The Fuji Pro-1 does look rather compact. Could be ideal as a second camera. Worth looking at?
Personally I have never got on with the Fuji X cameras, mainly over limitations with the AF. Fuji has improved the speed of its AF systems with firmware updates over the years, but at launch the Pro-1 was very slow. Based on my own experience of shooting with Fuji's own demo cameras, I also have concerns about accuracy. Finally, the Fuji system only allows focus to be specified at one point, but sometimes it is useful to be able to select a group. You should also be aware that the Pro-1 is now a relatively old camera, although the underlying technology is not too dissimilar to what is in the XT-1. It has a hybrid viewfinder which was something of a novelty when it first came out and which you might or might not find useful. Fuji uses a non bayer sensor arrangement and there are reports that some Raw converters such as ACR do not handle it well, with reports of smearing in some circumstances. Fuji's own Raw converter is better but based on Silkypix, which is not especially user friendly.
Before opting for a second camera, I would look at the reasons why you feel it is necessary to have one. Do you really want a second interchangeable lens system, with all that entails? You could be better off with a compact or a bridge camera such as the Sony RX10 or Panasonic FZ1000 which both have fast lenses with a wide zoom range. My own second system is based on m4/3, but had either of those two been available a few years back that might have been a better option.
Thom Hogan's recent post is a useful summary of what's best in the market at the moment and DPReview has just published its annual roundups for various categories of cameras.
http://www.dslrbodies.com/newsviews/wha ... d-buy.htmlhttp://www.dpreview.com/articles/050029 ... ra-rounduphttp://www.dpreview.com/articles/952781 ... ra-rounduphttp://www.dpreview.com/articles/455585 ... ss-roundup