Iggy wrote:Were the image transformations with the two systems on an automatic setting or a manual setting?
A mixture of both. Adobe and Skylum have different approaches to automation. I find that the Auto function in Lightroom's Basic panel provides a good starting point these days. That used not to be the case but Adobe enhanced it a while back. One of the benefits of having the subscription software is keeping up to date with the latest features.
Skylum's Luminar AI takes a different approach and suggests a range of templates based on its analysis of the image. The templates are divided into separate groups such as Landscape, Portrait or Close-up although I find that the subject of the image frequently fails to match the suggested category. It is then a matter of clicking on templates to find the best starting point. There is no option for a preview by hovering over the templates, so it can get a bit longwinded clicking on each. Ironic really, as the stated raison d'etre of Luminar AI is the use of artificial intelligence to apply manipulations automatically to make edits quicker. I find that It takes me far longer to get to the desired result using Luminar AI than Lightroom as the functions are poorly organised and the AI has limited utility.
Iggy wrote:Is it possible to manually brighten the sky a little more in Skylum's new Luminar AI editor so that it mirrors the combination of Lightroom and Nik?
Probably. I did try to get the two as closely matched as possible but did not want to spend too much time on it. After the initial application of the Lightroom Auto function or a Luminar template, the types of manual adjustments on offer are very similar. Luminar AI goes a bit further by offering features such as "Enhance" or "Glow", but Lightroom's Clarity and Texture controls often achieve something similar.